a disease called morality.

With truth lingering inexplicable to the individual, and the soul oppressed by the external forces of misconception, we can certainly infer chaos is existent. You see the human collective which is already contrived lacks the essentially and primary premise of the philosophical truth. I surmise this is so because the individual was conquered maliciously by the primitive minds of the emotionally distraught. Thus they form a means to designate appropriately to their manipulated perceptions, and contrive objective truth that the individuals cannot dissipate from. And so with this misconceived society ensuing the reconciliation of morality and truth is embedded in the oblivion of human consciousness.
Truth is unfathomable; the collective embraces it by manipulation and moral application.

When one speaks of complexity the perquisite of simplicity must be brought forth. Though upon discerning the simplicity we infer that a resolution is not present to the simple question. Perhaps contortion of the initial or traditional thought. For example Aristotle speaks frequently of the inferiority of women being the cause of mans divine will, and moral obligation. This inquisition, or more so previously concurred theory has now been contorted and abused. Perhaps due to the efficacy of a more dominate belief and moral efficaciousness. Now the society sees this previous consciousness of women suppression as being redundant, furthermore ludicrous. And thus the collective designates this theory as being primitive, or invalid. The invalidity of Aristotle’s theory is now the simplistic, and is dismayed. The perplexity of this is that we assert a revolutionized manner of contemplation and belief. And the repercussions of such an assertion are the later intricacies that entail. With all complex hypothesizes complexity imminently occurs. And so the collective is distraught by a perhaps new concept that rises, and instead of bringing forth the opposite and dismissed perspective, they contrive another one. So instead of inquisitively conjuring the now “simplistic” theory of Aristotle to resolve this new contention, they dismay caused by moral position.

The morality is a development of the collectively acknowledged belief, and application of principals associated with the present nature or historical nature of the human. With such a flabbergasting conglomeration of theories, and applicable emotions to such theories the morality bestrides its essence oppressing the ideal of inexplicability, which is truth. The morality of the collective is a governing law, a systematic lost philosophy (I speak of modern society) that dictates the obligation of human nature by means of manipulation. And because the philosophical premises is lingering lost in the abyss of dismay, like Aristotle’s theory on women, the collective ceases to reconcile it’s self by using the oppressing theory that defies the morality.

The collective is so immersed and enthralled with its oblivious position that external objectives are the mandate and human lot. The demise of the human is his lost philosophy. Essentially the individual unconscious submits himself to the collective which is a governing force dictated by moral laws. And thus is subject to the vanity of philosophical dismay, and perpetual irrelevancy he is oblivious too.

Morals cannot be justified unless acquiring the fundamental moral oppositions. Even so, even after attaining the opposition, you are still most certainly debating the same concept merely in a different perspective, which is truth. And such truth cannot be ascertained by human cohesive comprehension, and the emancipation cannot occur under the moral suppression of the collective. Good and evil, purpose and vanity, such facets cannot be constricted to the parameters of human moral observation and designation. The human must seek the simplicities long excused to acquire the truth of the self, and this is by means of abnegation as previously stated.

Morality is a plague and a disease. It assists the putrid vile human in resolving the questions of this so ambiguous existence. It is the conductive law and principled procedure to dismay and acquire content belief lacking logic and spirit. It may be stated that it is the morality which is most correlated with the spirit. I disagree because such divinity ceases to pertain the human extra nauseousness of contemplation and self. Morality coincides individuals with the collective, whether it is a theological, scientific, secular collective.

The morality is an emotional means to divulging conflicting feeling that derives from bewilderment. And unlike the existentialist we should not excuse this abstruse bewilderment, but ratify its existence. And not by means of platonic deductive absolute, but by means of intuitive subconscious implementation. Be means of becoming this abyss of ambiguousness. Morality is the ally of the inferior, the philosophically inept, and the collective mass. Morality coexists with the barbaric primitive impulse to survive, thus it is the enemy.

I am obliged to elucidate and thus I shall. The human existence is inscrutably insoluble, immaculately misconceived. And to exist to acquire comprehension of such truth is more relevant, but not the objective or as what I see to be pertinent universally. The objective is not to seek objective, for that would only limit the individual to a consolidated perspective and mandate, but to exist by liberating the concepts of objective. And such liberation, or human emancipation can only occur by the reconciliation of the human burdens, and emotions. By doing so the constructed moral premises of existence is not dismayed but understood, and the individual becomes one with the vanity.

For example, a soldier of a War endures the loss of his family members. First of all the repercussions of his blissful ignorant indulgence with such family members is his suffering. Nonetheless the solder is embedded amidst this repugnant atrocity, the war. Enveloped by the corrosive stench of putrid decaying bodies. And in this trench as this soldier contemplates, he infers none live to welcome his struggle. There is no cause for his struggle, but he is obliviously interjected into this struggle against his will, much like we are into life. Before the war this very moment was unfathomable, and now that previous moment is long diminished, much like the eternity prior to our faulted existence. And at that moment when the commanding officer says solder charge, that solder runs to his demise, or shall I say liberation. He has ascended beyond man be means of emotional resolution, and of conceptual comprehension that this inexplicable cause must not be understood conventionally, not felt irrationally, but coexistent with himself. I would debate that at this moment when the war country charged up from beyond his disdainful dilapidated trench was the only moment he was alive.

The morality world deprive the soldier, the morality would intuitively imbue him to return to his indulgent lifeless consciousness, of bliss and its inevitable ally misery. And thus morality should not be excused as previous stated, but understood in a transcended state of reality by means of emotional reconciliation, and subconscious truth.